Seek Returns logo

ERIC vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ERIC and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both ERIC and GDS are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolERICGDS
Company NameTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)GDS Holdings Limited
CountrySwedenChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentIT Services
Market Capitalization32.45 billion USD5.75 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGM
Listing DateAugust 24, 1981November 2, 2016
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ERIC and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ERIC vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolERICGDS
5-Day Price Return0.65%-9.57%
13-Week Price Return26.48%-9.85%
26-Week Price Return13.56%7.99%
52-Week Price Return6.36%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return-2.96%-13.70%
Year-to-Date Return3.43%29.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.25M5.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.46M10.11M
3-Month Volatility40.31%59.37%
Beta0.732.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ERIC

26.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
31.28%
Q3
24.67%
Median
13.12%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-12.73%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s Return on Equity of 26.66% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ERIC

10.26%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
28.72%
Q3
14.02%
Median
5.41%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-13.11%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 10.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ERIC

14.74%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
33.69%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-4.94%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.74% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolERICGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)26.66%19.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.77%6.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.26%42.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.74%22.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.62%21.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ERIC

1.17

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.28
Q3
2.10
Median
1.52
Q1
1.17
Min
0.91

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ERIC

0.43

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.96
Median
0.43
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
8.92
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolERICGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.172.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.941.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.431.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.820.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

ERIC vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ERIC vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ERIC

2.99%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
2.99%
Q3
2.30%
Median
0.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.99%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

45.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
61.16%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.50% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolERICGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.99%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.50%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

12.67

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
74.67
Q3
56.42
Median
31.00
Q1
15.93
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 12.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GDS

9.32

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 9.32 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ERIC

1.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.84
Q3
5.68
Median
2.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.40

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

3.99

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 3.99 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ERIC

2.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.02
Q3
6.01
Median
3.83
Q1
2.41
Min
0.42

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 2.55 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ERIC vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolERICGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.679.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.303.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.551.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.27--