Seek Returns logo

EQT vs. HAL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EQT and HAL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEQTHAL
Company NameEQT CorporationHalliburton Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization35.05 billion USD21.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQT and HAL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQT vs. HAL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEQTHAL
5-Day Price Return2.54%0.65%
13-Week Price Return-6.67%20.71%
26-Week Price Return2.85%-4.28%
52-Week Price Return49.00%-14.14%
Month-to-Date Return5.00%8.23%
Year-to-Date Return18.04%-9.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.85M17.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.13M14.33M
3-Month Volatility34.79%36.82%
Beta0.571.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQT

5.51%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

EQT’s Return on Equity of 5.51% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAL

17.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

HAL’s Return on Equity of 17.87% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQT

15.71%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

EQT’s Net Profit Margin of 15.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAL

8.37%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

HAL’s Net Profit Margin of 8.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQT

28.14%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

EQT’s Operating Profit Margin of 28.14% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAL

13.32%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

HAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.32% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEQTHAL
Return on Equity (TTM)5.51%17.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.87%7.34%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.71%8.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.14%13.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.55%17.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQT

0.71

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

EQT’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HAL

2.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

HAL’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQT

0.39

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

EQT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAL

0.72

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

HAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQT

1.75

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, EQT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HAL

9.96

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

HAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.96 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEQTHAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.712.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.651.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.759.96

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQT vs. HAL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQT vs. HAL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQT

1.06%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

EQT’s Dividend Yield of 1.06% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HAL

2.79%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

HAL’s Dividend Yield of 2.79% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQT

19.54%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

EQT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.54% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HAL

31.69%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

HAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.69% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEQTHAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.06%2.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.54%31.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQT

31.10

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

A P/E Ratio of 31.10 places EQT in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HAL

11.38

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, HAL’s P/E Ratio of 11.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQT

4.89

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

With a P/S Ratio of 4.89, EQT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HAL

0.95

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

HAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQT

1.63

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

EQT’s P/B Ratio of 1.63 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HAL

1.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

HAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.67 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQT vs. HAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEQTHAL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.1011.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.890.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.631.67
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.819.86