EQH vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at EQH and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	EQH	WFC
Company Name	Equitable Holdings, Inc.	Wells Fargo & Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Banks
Market Capitalization	15.60 billion USD	250.38 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 10, 2018	June 1, 1972
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQH and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQH vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	WFC
5-Day Price Return	-4.69%	-1.57%
13-Week Price Return	-3.03%	2.76%
26-Week Price Return	-3.09%	-0.88%
52-Week Price Return	26.96%	38.46%
Month-to-Date Return	1.42%	-3.06%
Year-to-Date Return	10.41%	11.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.36M	13.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.56M	17.24M
3-Month Volatility	26.63%	24.23%
Beta	1.14	1.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQH

22.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Return on Equity of 22.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	WFC
Return on Equity (TTM)	22.93%	11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.16%	1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.02%	22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.41%	25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	51.52%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

1.64

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

20.11

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	WFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.64	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.64	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	20.11	2.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.76	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQH vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQH vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQH

2.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.43% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WFC

2.53%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	WFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.43%	2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	21.08%	31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQH

32.57

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 32.57 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WFC

12.27

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.27 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQH

0.98

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

14.84

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

At 14.84, EQH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EQH vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	WFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	32.57	12.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.98	1.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	14.84	1.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.33	16.66