EQH vs. UNM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at EQH and UNM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	EQH	UNM
Company Name	Equitable Holdings, Inc.	Unum Group
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Insurance
Market Capitalization	16.36 billion USD	12.09 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 10, 2018	November 6, 1986
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQH and UNM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQH vs. UNM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	UNM
5-Day Price Return	8.50%	3.59%
13-Week Price Return	1.24%	-12.18%
26-Week Price Return	4.50%	-7.38%
52-Week Price Return	42.81%	32.98%
Month-to-Date Return	6.35%	-1.11%
Year-to-Date Return	15.77%	-2.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.56M	1.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.69M	1.42M
3-Month Volatility	28.39%	31.68%
Beta	1.14	0.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQH

56.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

EQH’s Return on Equity of 56.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UNM

13.67%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

UNM’s Return on Equity of 13.67% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UNM

11.77%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

UNM’s Net Profit Margin of 11.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UNM

16.48%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	UNM
Return on Equity (TTM)	56.77%	13.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.43%	2.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.02%	11.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.41%	16.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	51.52%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

1.35

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UNM

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

8.49

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

UNM

0.33

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

UNM

12.19

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	UNM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.35	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.35	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	8.49	0.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.76	12.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQH vs. UNM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQH vs. UNM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQH

2.34%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.34% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNM

2.55%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

UNM’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNM

20.11%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

UNM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.11% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	UNM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.34%	2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	21.08%	20.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQH

34.13

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 34.13 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UNM

7.90

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

In the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, UNM’s P/E Ratio of 7.90 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.03

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

UNM

0.93

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

UNM’s P/S Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

6.66

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

EQH’s P/B Ratio of 6.66 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UNM

1.24

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

UNM’s P/B Ratio of 1.24 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH vs. UNM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	UNM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	34.13	7.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.03	0.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	6.66	1.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	8.04	8.31