Seek Returns logo

EQH vs. KKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EQH and KKR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEQHKKR
Company NameEquitable Holdings, Inc.KKR & Co. Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesCapital Markets
Market Capitalization16.36 billion USD136.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 10, 2018July 15, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQH and KKR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQH vs. KKR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEQHKKR
5-Day Price Return8.50%3.71%
13-Week Price Return1.24%17.76%
26-Week Price Return4.50%-2.72%
52-Week Price Return42.81%30.85%
Month-to-Date Return6.35%0.60%
Year-to-Date Return15.77%-0.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.56M3.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.69M4.51M
3-Month Volatility28.39%31.71%
Beta1.141.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQH

56.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

EQH’s Return on Equity of 56.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KKR

9.12%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

KKR’s Return on Equity of 9.12% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KKR

10.87%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, KKR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.87% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KKR

3.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

KKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.67% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEQHKKR
Return on Equity (TTM)56.77%9.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.43%0.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%10.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.41%3.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.52%41.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

1.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KKR

0.34

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

8.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

KKR

1.82

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

KKR

-0.01

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEQHKKR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.350.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.491.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.76-0.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQH vs. KKR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQH vs. KKR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQH

2.34%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.34% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KKR

0.47%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KKR

19.90%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.90% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEQHKKR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.34%0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.08%19.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQH

34.13

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 34.13 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KKR

64.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

At 64.08, KKR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

KKR

6.97

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

KKR’s P/S Ratio of 6.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

6.66

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

EQH’s P/B Ratio of 6.66 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KKR

3.74

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

KKR’s P/B Ratio of 3.74 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEQHKKR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.1364.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.036.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.663.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.0417.08