EQH vs. KKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at EQH and KKR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	EQH	KKR
Company Name	Equitable Holdings, Inc.	KKR & Co. Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	13.14 billion USD	107.27 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 10, 2018	July 15, 2010
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQH and KKR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQH vs. KKR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	KKR
5-Day Price Return	0.25%	-6.05%
13-Week Price Return	-17.03%	-19.25%
26-Week Price Return	-17.58%	-11.63%
52-Week Price Return	-6.68%	-24.25%
Month-to-Date Return	-9.47%	-3.64%
Year-to-Date Return	-5.19%	-22.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.32M	5.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.86M	4.02M
3-Month Volatility	27.01%	33.32%
Beta	1.16	2.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQH

-52.70%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 34.42%
Q3: 16.76%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: 3.90%
Min: -10.16%

EQH has a negative Return on Equity of -52.70%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KKR

8.62%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 41.61%
Q3: 22.56%
Median: 13.62%
Q1: 9.23%
Min: -4.25%

KKR’s Return on Equity of 8.62% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

-4.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.33%
Median: 13.11%
Q1: 7.04%
Min: -8.99%

EQH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.62%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KKR

12.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 69.91%
Q3: 36.88%
Median: 24.30%
Q1: 13.14%
Min: -6.20%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, KKR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.07% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

12.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 81.07%
Q3: 40.32%
Median: 19.93%
Q1: 10.20%
Min: -34.40%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.18% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KKR

2.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 83.68%
Q3: 47.64%
Median: 32.36%
Q1: 19.28%
Min: 0.30%

KKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.06% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	KKR
Return on Equity (TTM)	-52.70%	8.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-0.23%	0.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-4.62%	12.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.18%	2.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	49.15%	36.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

3.08

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.36
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

KKR

0.41

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.43
Q3: 1.76
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.60
Min: 0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

135.93

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.11
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

KKR

1.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.78
Median: 0.96
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max: 140.54
Q3: 57.67
Median: 6.72
Q1: 1.93
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

KKR

-0.01

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 107.59
Q3: 50.42
Median: 10.94
Q1: 4.37
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	KKR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.08	0.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	3.08	0.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	135.93	1.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.76	-0.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQH vs. KKR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQH vs. KKR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQH

3.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.52%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.75%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KKR

0.71%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 8.63%
Q3: 4.88%
Median: 2.72%
Q1: 1.41%
Min: 0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 17.51%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KKR

22.21%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 188.84%
Q3: 96.52%
Median: 61.58%
Q1: 31.74%
Min: 0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.21% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	KKR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.09%	0.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	21.08%	22.21%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQH

Financial Services Industry

Max: 46.13
Q3: 28.79
Median: 13.18
Q1: 9.14
Min: 0.47

P/E Ratio data for EQH is currently unavailable.

KKR

43.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 47.53
Q3: 28.81
Median: 16.62
Q1: 12.06
Min: 5.71

A P/E Ratio of 43.25 places KKR in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQH

0.83

Financial Services Industry

Max: 9.71
Q3: 4.81
Median: 2.49
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

KKR

5.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 13.23
Q3: 6.65
Median: 4.40
Q1: 2.22
Min: 0.03

KKR’s P/S Ratio of 5.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

102.77

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.21
Q3: 3.51
Median: 1.52
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

At 102.77, EQH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KKR

3.89

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.83
Q3: 5.27
Median: 2.66
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.37

KKR’s P/B Ratio of 3.89 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH vs. KKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	KKR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	43.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.83	5.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	102.77	3.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.49	19.35