Seek Returns logo

ENSG vs. FMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ENSG and FMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ENSG is a standard domestic listing, while FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolENSGFMS
Company NameThe Ensign Group, Inc.Fresenius Medical Care AG
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization10.12 billion USD15.62 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 9, 2007September 17, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ENSG and FMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ENSG vs. FMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolENSGFMS
5-Day Price Return2.24%1.22%
13-Week Price Return16.79%-7.57%
26-Week Price Return35.55%-2.81%
52-Week Price Return20.68%16.48%
Month-to-Date Return1.52%1.99%
Year-to-Date Return32.02%1.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M0.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M0.54M
3-Month Volatility26.11%21.77%
Beta0.860.59

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ENSG

17.15%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, ENSG’s Return on Equity of 17.15% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ENSG

6.99%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.99% places ENSG in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ENSG

8.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

ENSG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolENSGFMS
Return on Equity (TTM)17.15%4.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.80%2.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.99%3.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.57%7.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.32%24.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ENSG

1.41

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

ENSG’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ENSG

0.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, ENSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ENSG

34.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.73, ENSG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolENSGFMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.411.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.321.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.070.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.735.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

ENSG vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ENSG vs. FMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ENSG

0.14%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENSG’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FMS

3.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.26%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ENSG

4.35%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.35% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolENSGFMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.14%3.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.35%187.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ENSG

31.28

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

A P/E Ratio of 31.28 places ENSG in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FMS

19.77

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 19.77 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ENSG

2.19

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

ENSG’s P/S Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FMS

0.66

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ENSG

4.40

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

ENSG’s P/B Ratio of 4.40 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ENSG vs. FMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolENSGFMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.2819.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.190.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.401.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.556.44