Seek Returns logo

ENPH vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ENPH and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolENPHSLB
Company NameEnphase Energy, Inc.Schlumberger Limited
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization4.67 billion USD49.76 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 30, 2012December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ENPH and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ENPH vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolENPHSLB
5-Day Price Return10.74%0.42%
13-Week Price Return-26.86%-4.98%
26-Week Price Return-42.99%-20.72%
52-Week Price Return-70.19%-26.46%
Month-to-Date Return10.26%-1.30%
Year-to-Date Return-48.05%-12.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.94M10.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.59M15.28M
3-Month Volatility90.54%30.80%
Beta1.571.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ENPH

20.22%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

ENPH’s Return on Equity of 20.22% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SLB

19.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

SLB’s Return on Equity of 19.85% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ENPH

11.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

ENPH’s Net Profit Margin of 11.78% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SLB

11.53%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.53% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ENPH

11.70%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

ENPH’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.70% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SLB

15.24%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.24% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolENPHSLB
Return on Equity (TTM)20.22%19.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.46%8.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.78%11.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.70%15.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.35%20.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

1.97

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

ENPH’s Current Ratio of 1.97 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SLB

1.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

1.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.37, ENPH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SLB

0.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

3.72

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ENPH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.72 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolENPHSLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.971.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.540.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.370.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.7243.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

ENPH vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ENPH vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ENPH

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENPH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SLB

3.11%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.11%, SLB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENPH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SLB

38.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.00% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolENPHSLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

27.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

ENPH’s P/E Ratio of 27.12 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SLB

12.23

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 12.23 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

3.19

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

ENPH’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SLB

1.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

5.91

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

ENPH’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SLB

2.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ENPH vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolENPHSLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.1212.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.191.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.912.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.7010.42