Seek Returns logo

ENPH vs. GLNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ENPH and GLNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolENPHGLNG
Company NameEnphase Energy, Inc.Golar LNG Limited
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization4.47 billion USD4.21 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 30, 2012July 15, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ENPH and GLNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ENPH vs. GLNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolENPHGLNG
5-Day Price Return7.64%-2.83%
13-Week Price Return-28.62%5.90%
26-Week Price Return-48.55%-1.57%
52-Week Price Return-68.64%19.86%
Month-to-Date Return5.75%-2.36%
Year-to-Date Return-50.17%-5.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.36M1.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.23M1.55M
3-Month Volatility90.18%26.03%
Beta1.580.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ENPH

20.22%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

ENPH’s Return on Equity of 20.22% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLNG

0.19%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

GLNG’s Return on Equity of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ENPH

11.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

ENPH’s Net Profit Margin of 11.78% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GLNG

1.48%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Net Profit Margin of 1.48% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ENPH

11.70%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

ENPH’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.70% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GLNG

4.74%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

GLNG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.74% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolENPHGLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)20.22%0.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.46%0.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.78%1.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.70%4.74%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.35%52.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

1.97

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

ENPH’s Current Ratio of 1.97 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GLNG

0.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

1.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.37, ENPH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GLNG

0.71

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

3.72

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ENPH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.72 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.01 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolENPHGLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.970.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.540.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.370.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.721.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

ENPH vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ENPH vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ENPH

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENPH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLNG

2.45%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.45% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENPH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GLNG

198.01%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

At 198.01%, GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolENPHGLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%198.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

25.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

ENPH’s P/E Ratio of 25.12 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GLNG

1,093.66

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 1,093.66, GLNG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

2.96

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

ENPH’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GLNG

16.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 16.18, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

5.91

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

ENPH’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLNG

1.99

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ENPH vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolENPHGLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.121,093.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.9616.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.911.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.76151.14