Seek Returns

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at ENLAY and IBDSF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
Company NameEnel SpAIberdrola, S.A.
CountryItalySpain
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesElectric Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryElectric UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization113.92 billion USD161.51 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeOTC Markets OTCPKOTC Markets OTCPK
Listing DateApril 28, 2008December 8, 2006
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

ENLAY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, IBDSF is a standard domestic listing.

ENLAY’s market capitalization stands at 113.92 billion USD, while IBDSF’s is 161.51 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ENLAY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, IBDSF is a standard domestic listing.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ENLAY and IBDSF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ENLAY+50.27%
IBDSF+111.00%
ENLAY vs. IBDSF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
5-Day Price Return0.92%0.30%
13-Week Price Return8.72%8.88%
26-Week Price Return15.01%17.17%
52-Week Price Return30.95%25.76%
Month-to-Date Return4.76%1.24%
Year-to-Date Return10.63%8.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.54M9.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume27.43M8.80M
3-Month Volatility28.48%18.07%
Beta0.590.40

With betas of 0.59 for ENLAY and 0.40 for IBDSF, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ENLAY

23.15%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
23.26%
Q3
14.53%
Median
10.39%
Q1
8.26%
Min
1.81%

In the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, ENLAY’s Return on Equity of 23.15% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBDSF

10.59%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
23.26%
Q3
14.53%
Median
10.39%
Q1
8.26%
Min
1.81%

IBDSF’s Return on Equity of 10.59% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ENLAY

7.57%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
30.48%
Q3
17.33%
Median
12.29%
Q1
7.53%
Min
-5.69%

ENLAY’s Net Profit Margin of 7.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBDSF

7.91%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
30.48%
Q3
17.33%
Median
12.29%
Q1
7.53%
Min
-5.69%

IBDSF’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ENLAY

18.48%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
45.32%
Q3
25.58%
Median
17.81%
Q1
12.18%
Min
-4.02%

ENLAY’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.48% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBDSF

12.28%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
45.32%
Q3
25.58%
Median
17.81%
Q1
12.18%
Min
-4.02%

IBDSF’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.28% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
Return on Equity (TTM)23.15%10.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.44%3.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%7.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.48%12.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.09%37.08%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ENLAY

0.72

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
1.64
Q3
1.17
Median
0.92
Q1
0.71
Min
0.09

ENLAY’s Current Ratio of 0.72 aligns with the median group of the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBDSF

0.81

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
1.64
Q3
1.17
Median
0.92
Q1
0.71
Min
0.09

IBDSF’s Current Ratio of 0.81 aligns with the median group of the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ENLAY

2.14

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
3.31
Q3
1.91
Median
1.29
Q1
0.63
Min
0.00

ENLAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IBDSF

1.00

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
3.31
Q3
1.91
Median
1.29
Q1
0.63
Min
0.00

IBDSF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ENLAY

5.02

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
18.68
Q3
11.74
Median
4.89
Q1
2.70
Min
-3.31

ENLAY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.02 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBDSF

5.01

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
18.68
Q3
11.74
Median
4.89
Q1
2.70
Min
-3.31

IBDSF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.720.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.640.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.141.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.025.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)25.06%291.88%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)37.09%77.49%
3-Year Revenue CAGR-4.45%-5.49%
5-Year Revenue CAGR9.86%6.56%

EPS Growth

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-72.07%516.67%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-11.64%8.84%
3-Year EPS CAGR36.13%15.17%
5-Year EPS CAGR10.21%14.09%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ENLAY

5.81%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
6.98%
Q3
4.28%
Median
3.10%
Q1
2.25%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.81%, ENLAY offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IBDSF

0.96%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
6.98%
Q3
4.28%
Median
3.10%
Q1
2.25%
Min
0.00%

IBDSF’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ENLAY

72.06%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
137.57%
Q3
84.53%
Median
62.07%
Q1
31.79%
Min
0.00%

ENLAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 72.06% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBDSF

50.28%

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
137.57%
Q3
84.53%
Median
62.07%
Q1
31.79%
Min
0.00%

IBDSF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.28% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.81%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)72.06%50.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ENLAY

12.41

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
39.55
Q3
23.37
Median
18.26
Q1
12.40
Min
3.31

ENLAY’s P/E Ratio of 12.41 is within the middle range for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBDSF

21.18

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
39.55
Q3
23.37
Median
18.26
Q1
12.40
Min
3.31

IBDSF’s P/E Ratio of 21.18 is within the middle range for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ENLAY

0.94

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
7.23
Q3
3.82
Median
1.96
Q1
0.94
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, ENLAY’s P/S Ratio of 0.94 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IBDSF

1.68

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
7.23
Q3
3.82
Median
1.96
Q1
0.94
Min
0.16

IBDSF’s P/S Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ENLAY

2.81

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
2.89
Q3
2.01
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

ENLAY’s P/B Ratio of 2.81 is in the upper tier for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IBDSF

1.86

Electric Utilities Industry
Max
2.89
Q3
2.01
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.34

IBDSF’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ENLAY vs. IBDSF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electric Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolENLAYIBDSF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.4121.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.941.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.811.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.1615.40