Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EMR is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEMRZTO
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization75.85 billion USD15.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRZTO
5-Day Price Return2.74%-1.53%
13-Week Price Return-2.62%6.32%
26-Week Price Return22.52%-5.67%
52-Week Price Return22.93%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return2.74%0.34%
Year-to-Date Return8.75%-2.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.09M1.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.13M2.53M
3-Month Volatility23.21%37.44%
Beta1.250.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZTO

13.99%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 13.99% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZTO

18.81%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 18.81% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZTO

23.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%13.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%9.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%18.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%23.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%27.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ZTO

1.21

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.29

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.57--

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.58%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.58%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.51

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.51 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZTO

12.12

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 12.12 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.25 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZTO

2.28

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 2.28, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZTO

1.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.59 is within the conventional range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EMR vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.5112.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.252.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.771.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.5810.10