Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRVRSK
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentProfessional Services
Market Capitalization75.84 billion USD34.79 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1972October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRVRSK
5-Day Price Return4.26%0.10%
13-Week Price Return-3.58%-18.10%
26-Week Price Return22.91%-16.32%
52-Week Price Return21.99%-7.06%
Month-to-Date Return2.73%-0.98%
Year-to-Date Return8.74%-9.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.17M1.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.14M1.06M
3-Month Volatility23.39%21.57%
Beta1.250.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.67% places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.7210.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.5743.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.58%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.58%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VRSK

0.68%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.46

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.46 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

38.11

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 38.11 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.25 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK

11.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 11.69, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EMR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.4638.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.2511.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.77139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.5434.22