Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRUPS
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization75.84 billion USD73.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRUPS
5-Day Price Return4.26%2.70%
13-Week Price Return-3.58%-16.66%
26-Week Price Return22.91%-21.10%
52-Week Price Return21.99%-34.76%
Month-to-Date Return2.73%3.89%
Year-to-Date Return8.74%-31.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.17M8.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.14M7.20M
3-Month Volatility23.39%29.43%
Beta1.251.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.721.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.579.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.58%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.58%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UPS

7.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%7.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.46

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.46 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UPS

12.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.82 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.25 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UPS

0.81

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.43 is in the upper tier for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EMR vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.4612.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.250.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.775.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.5413.67
EMR vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison