Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRULS
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.UL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentProfessional Services
Market Capitalization73.16 billion USD17.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRULS
5-Day Price Return-5.63%-0.03%
13-Week Price Return-1.49%31.25%
26-Week Price Return18.32%24.19%
52-Week Price Return2.20%73.69%
Month-to-Date Return-6.86%11.63%
Year-to-Date Return4.89%74.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.65M0.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.07M0.75M
3-Month Volatility24.59%36.41%
Beta1.260.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

12.73%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.73% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

18.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.00% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRULS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.73%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.00%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.84%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

13.38

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.3811.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.64%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ULS

0.58%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.64%0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

31.78

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 31.78 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ULS

53.40

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

At 53.40, ULS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.05

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.05 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ULS

5.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 5.92 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EMR vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.7853.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.055.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.7713.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.5947.97