Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EMR is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEMRPAC
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization75.85 billion USD11.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRPAC
5-Day Price Return2.74%-5.47%
13-Week Price Return-2.62%-3.16%
26-Week Price Return22.52%9.97%
52-Week Price Return22.93%31.95%
Month-to-Date Return2.74%-2.61%
Year-to-Date Return8.75%15.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.09M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.13M0.70M
3-Month Volatility23.21%22.19%
Beta1.251.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
15.14%
Median
10.37%
Q1
6.63%
Min
1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
56.87%
Q3
32.94%
Median
20.37%
Q1
11.21%
Min
1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.60%
Q3
46.73%
Median
31.03%
Q1
15.90%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.90
Q3
1.82
Median
1.16
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.64
Median
0.83
Q1
0.27
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.45
Median
7.97
Q1
4.97
Min
2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.722.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.575.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.58%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.58%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PAC

2.55%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.64%
Q3
4.96%
Median
2.38%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
206.16%
Q3
111.39%
Median
71.16%
Q1
37.58%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.51

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.51 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
33.87
Q3
28.56
Median
17.26
Q1
11.95
Min
6.33

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.58 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.25 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.54

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.89
Q3
5.40
Median
3.20
Q1
1.62
Min
0.87

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.00
Median
1.96
Q1
1.22
Min
0.38

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EMR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.5119.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.254.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.779.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.5818.06