Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRLUV
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.Southwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization75.98 billion USD16.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRLUV
5-Day Price Return1.63%4.77%
13-Week Price Return13.06%-0.96%
26-Week Price Return5.90%-0.39%
52-Week Price Return30.98%22.03%
Month-to-Date Return-7.22%0.13%
Year-to-Date Return8.93%-7.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.83M9.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.30M12.50M
3-Month Volatility23.55%40.35%
Beta1.301.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRLUV
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRLUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.579.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.59%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.59%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LUV

2.65%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.65% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRLUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.59%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.34 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV

41.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 41.16, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LUV

0.59

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EMR vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRLUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3441.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.230.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.772.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.4243.02