Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. ITT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and ITT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRITT
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.ITT Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentMachinery
Market Capitalization72.69 billion USD14.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972December 15, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and ITT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. ITT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRITT
5-Day Price Return-1.85%-3.33%
13-Week Price Return-3.17%11.66%
26-Week Price Return5.01%22.75%
52-Week Price Return-1.98%20.24%
Month-to-Date Return-8.59%-0.21%
Year-to-Date Return2.95%29.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.14M0.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.01M0.40M
3-Month Volatility25.45%30.86%
Beta1.271.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.25%
Q3
23.48%
Median
11.69%
Q1
6.40%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ITT

17.96%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

ITT’s Return on Equity of 17.96% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

12.73%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.74%
Q3
10.52%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.04%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.73% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ITT

12.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.67% places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

18.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.16%
Q3
14.51%
Median
8.86%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.00% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ITT

17.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.46% places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRITT
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%17.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%9.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.73%12.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.00%17.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.84%35.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.05
Median
1.44
Q1
1.14
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ITT

1.52

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

ITT’s Current Ratio of 1.52 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.91
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ITT

0.37

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

ITT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

13.38

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
20.31
Median
9.84
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ITT

20.74

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

ITT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.74 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRITT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.99
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.3820.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. ITT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. ITT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.67%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.91%
Q3
1.66%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.67%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ITT

0.76%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

ITT’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
130.92%
Q3
64.56%
Median
37.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ITT

22.66%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

ITT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.66% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRITT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.67%0.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%22.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

31.26

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
37.50
Median
23.51
Q1
19.68
Min
8.22

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 31.26 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ITT

29.79

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

A P/E Ratio of 29.79 places ITT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

3.98

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.22
Q3
4.00
Median
1.70
Q1
1.04
Min
0.43

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 3.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ITT

3.78

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

ITT’s P/S Ratio of 3.78 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.81
Q3
5.42
Median
3.69
Q1
1.77
Min
0.78

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ITT

5.18

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

ITT’s P/B Ratio of 5.18 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EMR vs. ITT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRITT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.2629.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.983.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.775.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.1526.33