Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. HUBB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and HUBB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRHUBB
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.Hubbell Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization75.98 billion USD23.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972June 5, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and HUBB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. HUBB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRHUBB
5-Day Price Return1.63%6.25%
13-Week Price Return13.06%17.32%
26-Week Price Return5.90%12.40%
52-Week Price Return30.98%18.94%
Month-to-Date Return-7.22%1.48%
Year-to-Date Return8.93%5.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.83M0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.30M0.63M
3-Month Volatility23.55%26.09%
Beta1.300.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HUBB

25.10%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, HUBB’s Return on Equity of 25.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HUBB

14.76%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.76% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HUBB

20.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.20% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRHUBB
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%25.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%12.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%14.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%20.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%34.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HUBB

1.30

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

HUBB’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HUBB

0.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

HUBB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HUBB

14.62

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

HUBB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRHUBB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.5714.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. HUBB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. HUBB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.59%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.59%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HUBB

1.19%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Yield of 1.19% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HUBB

33.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRHUBB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.59%1.19%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%33.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.34 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HUBB

28.04

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

HUBB’s P/E Ratio of 28.04 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HUBB

4.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

HUBB’s P/S Ratio of 4.14 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUBB

6.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

HUBB’s P/B Ratio of 6.25 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EMR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electrical Equipment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRHUBB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.3428.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.234.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.776.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.4229.64