Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRGFL
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.GFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization73.83 billion USD16.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRGFL
5-Day Price Return-0.56%2.07%
13-Week Price Return-1.61%-3.14%
26-Week Price Return15.49%-4.46%
52-Week Price Return20.11%22.26%
Month-to-Date Return-0.62%-3.99%
Year-to-Date Return5.85%2.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.68M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.17M0.44M
3-Month Volatility23.54%22.17%
Beta1.290.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.57-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.62%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.62%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GFL

0.13%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.13% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.62%0.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

27.79

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 27.79 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

6.64

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 6.64 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.15

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL

3.31

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EMR vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.796.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.153.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.773.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8972.36