Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. FER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and FER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRFER
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.Ferrovial SE
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization75.98 billion USD39.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1972August 13, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and FER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. FER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRFER
5-Day Price Return1.63%1.61%
13-Week Price Return13.06%4.65%
26-Week Price Return5.90%11.20%
52-Week Price Return30.98%23.92%
Month-to-Date Return-7.22%1.29%
Year-to-Date Return8.93%12.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.83M0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.30M0.69M
3-Month Volatility23.55%14.08%
Beta1.300.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRFER
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%56.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%35.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%34.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%87.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRFER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.850.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.721.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.579.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.59%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.59%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FER

0.37%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.37% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRFER
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.59%0.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%3.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

28.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.34 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER

9.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 9.68 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FER

3.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.48, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EMR vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRFER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.349.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.233.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.775.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.4228.40