Seek Returns logo

EME vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMESTN
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.Stantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization27.61 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMESTN
5-Day Price Return-0.13%-0.96%
13-Week Price Return34.86%14.45%
26-Week Price Return32.01%37.34%
52-Week Price Return73.33%38.53%
Month-to-Date Return-1.72%-0.75%
Year-to-Date Return35.87%33.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.38M0.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.47M0.27M
3-Month Volatility29.57%18.10%
Beta1.270.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.63% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.84% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMESTN
Return on Equity (TTM)37.80%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.03%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.07%7.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.50%9.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.49%66.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMESTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.131.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.2760.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

STN

0.56%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.56% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

STN

20.71%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.71% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMESTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.14%20.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

24.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.61 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN

37.15

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 37.15, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.74

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STN

2.83

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EME vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMESTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6137.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.742.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.854.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5131.05