Seek Returns logo

EME vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and ROP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMEROP
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.Roper Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringSoftware
Market Capitalization27.09 billion USD58.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995February 13, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and ROP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. ROP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMEROP
5-Day Price Return-0.76%2.96%
13-Week Price Return28.75%-6.88%
26-Week Price Return41.53%-5.74%
52-Week Price Return64.20%-1.70%
Month-to-Date Return-3.56%-1.80%
Year-to-Date Return33.32%3.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.28M0.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M0.58M
3-Month Volatility28.32%14.57%
Beta1.271.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ROP

20.62%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.62% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ROP

28.06%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.06% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMEROP
Return on Equity (TTM)37.80%8.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.03%4.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.07%20.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.50%28.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.49%68.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROP

0.46

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ROP

0.45

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97, ROP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMEROP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.180.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.130.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.2780.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ROP

0.58%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ROP

21.99%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 21.99%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMEROP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.14%21.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

24.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.48 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ROP

37.65

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 37.65 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.73

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROP

7.76

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 7.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROP

3.10

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EME vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMEROP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.4837.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.737.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.853.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.3825.39