Seek Returns logo

EME vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMERKLB
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.Rocket Lab Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization26.03 billion USD21.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995November 24, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. RKLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMERKLB
5-Day Price Return-5.93%-13.31%
13-Week Price Return-4.55%-4.94%
26-Week Price Return24.06%53.02%
52-Week Price Return13.44%92.59%
Month-to-Date Return-13.72%-37.31%
Year-to-Date Return28.46%55.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M22.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.55M22.10M
3-Month Volatility48.01%81.32%
Beta1.232.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

36.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.67%
Median
11.05%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-2.38%

EME’s Return on Equity of 36.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RKLB

-28.40%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -28.40%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

6.96%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.49%
Median
3.88%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-2.27%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.96% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKLB

-35.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.41%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.70%
Median
5.84%
Q1
3.94%
Min
-1.78%

EME’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.41% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-41.36%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.36%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMERKLB
Return on Equity (TTM)36.84%-28.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.77%-12.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.96%-35.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.41%-41.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.39%31.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.19

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.26
Q3
1.54
Median
1.25
Q1
0.99
Min
0.65

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RKLB

3.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.00

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.33
Median
0.64
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RKLB

0.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
30.69
Q3
15.27
Median
7.88
Q1
4.27
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMERKLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.193.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.142.69
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.27-45.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.25%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.17%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
144.77%
Q3
74.39%
Median
50.47%
Q1
8.02%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.01% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMERKLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

22.91

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
39.16
Q3
24.60
Median
17.05
Q1
13.85
Min
1.65

EME’s P/E Ratio of 22.91 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKLB

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.59

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.52
Median
0.80
Q1
0.48
Min
0.12

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.59 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKLB

38.82

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 38.82, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

8.72

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
3.97
Median
1.90
Q1
1.22
Min
0.24

At 8.72, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB

18.10

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

RKLB’s P/B Ratio of 18.10 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EME vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMERKLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.91--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.5938.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.7218.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.55--