Seek Returns logo

EME vs. MYRG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and MYRG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMEMYRG
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.MYR Group Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization29.29 billion USD3.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995August 13, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and MYRG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. MYRG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMEMYRG
5-Day Price Return2.15%-4.02%
13-Week Price Return19.59%6.88%
26-Week Price Return77.04%75.49%
52-Week Price Return52.23%93.87%
Month-to-Date Return0.75%-4.02%
Year-to-Date Return44.17%34.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.44M0.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.53M0.20M
3-Month Volatility28.48%33.58%
Beta1.181.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MYRG

13.16%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

MYRG’s Return on Equity of 13.16% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MYRG

2.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MYRG’s Net Profit Margin of 2.21% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

EME’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MYRG

3.61%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

MYRG’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.61% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMEMYRG
Return on Equity (TTM)37.80%13.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.03%4.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.07%2.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.50%3.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.49%10.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MYRG

1.33

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

MYRG’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MYRG

0.15

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MYRG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MYRG

8.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

MYRG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.61 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMEMYRG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.131.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.278.61

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. MYRG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. MYRG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.16%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MYRG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

MYRG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MYRG

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

MYRG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMEMYRG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.16%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.14%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

26.58

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

EME’s P/E Ratio of 26.58 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MYRG

40.90

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 40.90 places MYRG in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.88

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MYRG

0.91

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

MYRG’s P/S Ratio of 0.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

EME’s P/B Ratio of 7.85 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MYRG

4.83

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

MYRG’s P/B Ratio of 4.83 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EME vs. MYRG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMEMYRG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.5840.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.880.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.854.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.3128.76