EME vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at EME and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	EME	GPN
Company Name	EMCOR Group, Inc.	Global Payments Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Financials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	29.29 billion USD	21.34 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 10, 1995	January 16, 2001
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	EME	GPN
5-Day Price Return	2.15%	1.88%
13-Week Price Return	19.59%	7.46%
26-Week Price Return	77.04%	-10.17%
52-Week Price Return	52.23%	-9.93%
Month-to-Date Return	0.75%	5.87%
Year-to-Date Return	44.17%	-21.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.44M	2.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.53M	2.58M
3-Month Volatility	28.48%	36.09%
Beta	1.18	0.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

EME’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	EME	GPN
Return on Equity (TTM)	37.80%	6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.03%	2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.07%	15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.50%	23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	19.49%	65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	EME	GPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	0.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.13	0.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.08	0.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	490.27	5.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.16%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GPN

1.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	EME	GPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.16%	1.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	4.14%	17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

26.58

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

EME’s P/E Ratio of 26.58 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GPN

14.91

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.91 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.88

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GPN

2.25

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

EME’s P/B Ratio of 7.85 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EME vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	EME	GPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	26.58	14.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.88	2.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.85	0.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.31	6.83