Seek Returns logo

EME vs. FTAI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and FTAI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMEFTAI
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.FTAI Aviation Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization27.61 billion USD14.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995May 14, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and FTAI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. FTAI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMEFTAI
5-Day Price Return-0.13%5.74%
13-Week Price Return34.86%29.25%
26-Week Price Return32.01%22.89%
52-Week Price Return73.33%40.68%
Month-to-Date Return-1.72%6.10%
Year-to-Date Return35.87%1.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.38M1.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.47M1.78M
3-Month Volatility29.57%67.10%
Beta1.271.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FTAI

464.64%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

FTAI’s Return on Equity of 464.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTAI

21.31%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FTAI’s Net Profit Margin of 21.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTAI

26.26%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FTAI’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMEFTAI
Return on Equity (TTM)37.80%464.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.03%11.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.07%21.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.50%26.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.49%48.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTAI

5.01

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FTAI’s Current Ratio of 5.01 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTAI

20.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.88, FTAI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FTAI

1.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

In the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FTAI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.06 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMEFTAI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.185.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.132.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.0820.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.271.06

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. FTAI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. FTAI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FTAI

0.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FTAI

32.60%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FTAI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.60% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMEFTAI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.14%32.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

24.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.61 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTAI

32.79

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 32.79 places FTAI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.74

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTAI

6.99

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

With a P/S Ratio of 6.99, FTAI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTAI

71.53

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

At 71.53, FTAI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EME vs. FTAI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMEFTAI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6132.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.746.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.8571.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.51--