Seek Returns logo

EME vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMEFLR
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.Fluor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization27.27 billion USD6.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995December 1, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMEFLR
5-Day Price Return0.34%-0.05%
13-Week Price Return32.91%9.77%
26-Week Price Return40.09%4.35%
52-Week Price Return63.42%-15.35%
Month-to-Date Return-2.92%-27.34%
Year-to-Date Return34.21%-16.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M4.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.42M4.02M
3-Month Volatility28.00%71.17%
Beta1.271.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMEFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)37.80%105.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.03%45.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.07%25.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.50%1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.49%3.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMEFLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.131.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.27--

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMEFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.14%10.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

24.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.48 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR

1.59

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.59 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.73

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR

0.40

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EME vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMEFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.481.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.730.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.851.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.386.96