Seek Returns logo

EME vs. FERG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EME and FERG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMEFERG
Company NameEMCOR Group, Inc.Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization27.61 billion USD46.13 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 10, 1995January 5, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and FERG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. FERG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMEFERG
5-Day Price Return-0.13%2.27%
13-Week Price Return34.86%30.15%
26-Week Price Return32.01%26.10%
52-Week Price Return73.33%17.38%
Month-to-Date Return-1.72%2.92%
Year-to-Date Return35.87%32.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.38M1.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.47M1.61M
3-Month Volatility29.57%38.72%
Beta1.271.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FERG

28.84%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, FERG’s Return on Equity of 28.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FERG

5.32%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

FERG’s Net Profit Margin of 5.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FERG

8.25%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

FERG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.25% is around the midpoint for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMEFERG
Return on Equity (TTM)37.80%28.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.03%9.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.07%5.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.50%8.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.49%30.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FERG

1.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

FERG’s Current Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the median group of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FERG

0.74

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

FERG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FERG

14.77

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

FERG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.77 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMEFERG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.130.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)490.2714.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. FERG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. FERG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FERG

1.43%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Yield of 1.43% is consistent with its peers in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FERG

56.55%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

FERG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.55% is within the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMEFERG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%1.43%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)4.14%56.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

24.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.61 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FERG

28.04

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

A P/E Ratio of 28.04 places FERG in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.74

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FERG

1.49

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

FERG’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FERG

6.10

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

FERG’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EME vs. FERG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMEFERG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6128.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.741.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.856.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5132.44