Seek Returns logo

ELF vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ELF and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ELF is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolELFUL
Company Namee.l.f. Beauty, Inc.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization6.83 billion USD155.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 22, 2016March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ELF and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ELF vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELFUL
5-Day Price Return0.70%3.92%
13-Week Price Return51.36%-0.93%
26-Week Price Return60.69%6.66%
52-Week Price Return-24.77%-2.07%
Month-to-Date Return-0.62%6.44%
Year-to-Date Return-4.07%3.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.18M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M2.43M
3-Month Volatility71.65%15.01%
Beta1.600.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ELF

15.15%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

ELF’s Return on Equity of 15.15% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ELF

8.53%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

ELF’s Net Profit Margin of 8.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ELF

12.03%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

ELF’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.03% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELFUL
Return on Equity (TTM)15.15%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.05%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.53%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.03%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.24%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

3.05

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

ELF’s Current Ratio of 3.05 is in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

0.34

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

ELF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ELF

11.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

ELF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELFUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.050.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.550.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.341.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.5322.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

ELF vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ELF vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

ELF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

ELF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELFUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ELF

60.44

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

At 60.44, ELF’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ELF

5.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

ELF’s P/S Ratio of 5.16 is in the upper echelon for the Personal Care Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

4.65

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

ELF’s P/B Ratio of 4.65 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ELF vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELFUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)60.4423.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.162.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.657.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.1620.05