Seek Returns logo

ELF vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ELF and HIMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELFHIMS
Company Namee.l.f. Beauty, Inc.Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesHealth Care
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization8.23 billion USD13.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 22, 2016September 13, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ELF and HIMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ELF vs. HIMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELFHIMS
5-Day Price Return6.74%0.52%
13-Week Price Return23.30%13.52%
26-Week Price Return163.67%107.82%
52-Week Price Return42.91%199.23%
Month-to-Date Return9.50%2.56%
Year-to-Date Return15.55%140.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.27M27.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M35.47M
3-Month Volatility55.86%80.79%
Beta1.742.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ELF

12.79%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

ELF’s Return on Equity of 12.79% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ELF

7.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

ELF’s Net Profit Margin of 7.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ELF

11.62%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

ELF’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.62% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELFHIMS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.79%38.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.73%18.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.29%9.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.62%6.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.67%76.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

3.26

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

ELF’s Current Ratio of 3.26 is in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

0.32

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

ELF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ELF

11.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

ELF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELFHIMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.264.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.864.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.321.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.53--

Growth

Revenue Growth

ELF vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ELF vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

ELF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

ELF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELFHIMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ELF

84.94

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

At 84.94, ELF’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HIMS

67.91

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

At 67.91, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ELF

6.19

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 6.19, ELF trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Personal Care Products industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HIMS

6.53

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.53, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

8.77

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

ELF’s P/B Ratio of 8.77 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ELF vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELFHIMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)84.9467.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.196.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.7719.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)53.7255.59