Seek Returns logo

EL vs. PEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EL and PEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELPEP
Company NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.PepsiCo, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization34.27 billion USD204.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EL and PEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EL vs. PEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELPEP
5-Day Price Return4.43%3.77%
13-Week Price Return45.75%13.42%
26-Week Price Return48.24%2.75%
52-Week Price Return10.51%-12.87%
Month-to-Date Return2.06%8.29%
Year-to-Date Return27.05%-1.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.88M7.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.20M9.38M
3-Month Volatility44.30%24.37%
Beta1.160.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EL

-18.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -18.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PEP

40.65%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, PEP’s Return on Equity of 40.65% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-5.89%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

PEP

8.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

PEP’s Net Profit Margin of 8.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-4.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

PEP

11.11%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

PEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.11% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELPEP
Return on Equity (TTM)-18.42%40.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.22%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.89%8.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.25%11.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.85%54.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.41

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PEP

0.78

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

PEP’s Current Ratio of 0.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.68

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PEP

2.79

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79, PEP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Beverages industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EL

4.66

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, EL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PEP

13.98

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

PEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELPEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.682.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.6613.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

EL vs. PEP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EL vs. PEP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EL

2.19%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 2.19% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PEP

3.67%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

PEP’s Dividend Yield of 3.67% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PEP

98.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

PEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.89% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELPEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.19%3.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.25%98.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

PEP

26.96

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

PEP’s P/E Ratio of 26.96 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EL

2.25

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PEP

2.22

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

PEP’s P/S Ratio of 2.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EL

5.46

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

EL’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PEP

9.77

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 9.77, PEP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EL vs. PEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELPEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--26.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.252.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.469.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9423.56