Seek Returns logo

EL vs. MO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EL and MO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELMO
Company NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.Altria Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsTobacco
Market Capitalization34.27 billion USD110.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EL and MO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EL vs. MO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELMO
5-Day Price Return4.43%3.07%
13-Week Price Return45.75%15.01%
26-Week Price Return48.24%24.43%
52-Week Price Return10.51%30.19%
Month-to-Date Return2.06%5.75%
Year-to-Date Return27.05%25.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.88M7.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.20M8.98M
3-Month Volatility44.30%20.56%
Beta1.160.60

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EL

-18.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -18.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MO

149.65%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

MO’s Return on Equity of 149.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-5.89%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MO

37.24%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

MO’s Net Profit Margin of 37.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-4.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MO

46.84%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

MO’s Operating Profit Margin of 46.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELMO
Return on Equity (TTM)-18.42%149.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.22%25.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.89%37.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.25%46.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.85%61.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.41

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MO

0.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

MO’s Current Ratio of 0.39 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.68

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MO

8.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.67, MO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EL

4.66

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, EL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MO

36.48

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

MO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.48 is in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.688.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.6636.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

EL vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EL vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EL

2.19%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 2.19% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MO

6.25%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.25%, MO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MO

78.29%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

At 78.29%, MO’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Tobacco industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.19%6.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.25%78.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

MO

12.52

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

MO’s P/E Ratio of 12.52 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EL

2.25

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MO

4.66

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

MO’s P/S Ratio of 4.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EL

5.46

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

EL’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MO

27.09

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 27.09, MO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EL vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELMO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--12.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.254.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.4627.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9412.60