Seek Returns logo

EL vs. MNST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EL and MNST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELMNST
Company NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.Monster Beverage Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization32.83 billion USD61.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EL and MNST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EL vs. MNST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELMNST
5-Day Price Return0.54%-2.00%
13-Week Price Return43.31%-0.41%
26-Week Price Return26.37%23.10%
52-Week Price Return-0.31%33.67%
Month-to-Date Return-2.26%6.96%
Year-to-Date Return21.67%19.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.29M5.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.11M5.77M
3-Month Volatility45.35%23.15%
Beta1.160.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EL

-18.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -18.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-5.89%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-4.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELMNST
Return on Equity (TTM)-18.42%24.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.22%19.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.89%20.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.25%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.85%55.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.41

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Beverages industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.68

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EL

4.66

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, EL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.413.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.892.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.680.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.66123.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

EL vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EL vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EL

2.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 2.29% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.29%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.25%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

MNST

40.32

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 40.32 places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EL

2.15

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MNST

8.28

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 8.28, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EL

5.46

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

EL’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELMNST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--40.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.158.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.468.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.1034.20