Seek Returns logo

EL vs. K: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EL and K, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELK
Company NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.Kellanova
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization34.27 billion USD27.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EL and K by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EL vs. K: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELK
5-Day Price Return4.43%0.15%
13-Week Price Return45.75%-2.55%
26-Week Price Return48.24%-2.35%
52-Week Price Return10.51%8.39%
Month-to-Date Return2.06%0.46%
Year-to-Date Return27.05%-0.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.88M2.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.20M3.43M
3-Month Volatility44.30%7.23%
Beta1.160.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EL

-18.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -18.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

K

34.57%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

K’s Return on Equity of 34.57% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-5.89%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

K

10.56%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.56% places K in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-4.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

K

14.67%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.67% places K in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELK
Return on Equity (TTM)-18.42%34.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.22%8.51%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.89%10.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.25%14.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.85%35.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.41

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

K

0.68

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

K’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.68

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

K

1.43

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

K’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.43. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EL

4.66

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, EL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

K

49.65

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

K’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 49.65 is in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.681.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.6649.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

EL vs. K: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EL vs. K: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EL

2.19%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 2.19% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

K

2.83%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

K’s Dividend Yield of 2.83% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

K

59.03%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

K’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.03% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELK
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.19%2.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.25%59.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

K

20.87

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

K’s P/E Ratio of 20.87 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EL

2.25

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

K

2.20

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

K’s P/S Ratio of 2.20 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EL

5.46

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

EL’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

K

6.72

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

At 6.72, K’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Food Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EL vs. K: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--20.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.252.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.466.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9439.23