Seek Returns logo

EL vs. GIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EL and GIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELGIS
Company NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.General Mills, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization34.51 billion USD26.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EL and GIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EL vs. GIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELGIS
5-Day Price Return7.87%-1.13%
13-Week Price Return10.56%-2.83%
26-Week Price Return64.56%-18.40%
52-Week Price Return-0.29%-31.61%
Month-to-Date Return8.67%-1.33%
Year-to-Date Return27.71%-21.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.21M5.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.86M5.90M
3-Month Volatility39.22%19.29%
Beta1.15-0.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EL

-25.95%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -25.95%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GIS

31.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

GIS’s Return on Equity of 31.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-7.91%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GIS

15.24%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.24% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-5.48%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GIS

21.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.92% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELGIS
Return on Equity (TTM)-25.95%31.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)-5.61%8.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7.91%15.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5.48%21.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.96%34.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.30

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GIS

0.66

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.89

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GIS

1.52

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EL

-3.28

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

EL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.28. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELGIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.300.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.820.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.891.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.286.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

EL vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EL vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EL

1.86%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GIS

4.99%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.99%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIS

45.62%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.62% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELGIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.86%4.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.25%45.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

GIS

9.13

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 9.13 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EL

2.32

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GIS

1.39

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EL

7.52

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

EL’s P/B Ratio of 7.52 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GIS

2.77

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EL vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELGIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--9.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.321.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.522.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.4212.72