Seek Returns logo

EL vs. ELF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EL and ELF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELELF
Company NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization33.33 billion USD7.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995September 22, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EL and ELF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EL vs. ELF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELELF
5-Day Price Return5.57%7.39%
13-Week Price Return38.10%36.18%
26-Week Price Return28.98%66.71%
52-Week Price Return-2.00%-19.98%
Month-to-Date Return-0.78%3.06%
Year-to-Date Return23.51%-0.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.56M1.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.11M2.41M
3-Month Volatility45.22%73.41%
Beta1.161.60

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EL

-18.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -18.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ELF

15.15%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

ELF’s Return on Equity of 15.15% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-5.89%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ELF

8.53%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

ELF’s Net Profit Margin of 8.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EL

-4.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ELF

12.03%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

ELF’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.03% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELELF
Return on Equity (TTM)-18.42%15.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.22%9.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.89%8.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.25%12.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.85%71.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.41

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ELF

3.05

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

ELF’s Current Ratio of 3.05 is in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EL

1.68

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ELF

0.34

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

ELF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EL

4.66

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, EL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ELF

11.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

ELF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELELF
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.413.05
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.680.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.6611.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

EL vs. ELF: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EL vs. ELF: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EL

2.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 2.29% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

ELF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

ELF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELELF
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.29%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)79.25%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

ELF

60.44

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

At 60.44, ELF’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EL

2.15

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ELF

5.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

ELF’s P/S Ratio of 5.16 is in the upper echelon for the Personal Care Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EL

5.46

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

EL’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ELF

4.65

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

ELF’s P/B Ratio of 4.65 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EL vs. ELF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Personal Care Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELELF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--60.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.155.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.464.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.1050.16