EG vs. WTW: Everest vs. Willis Towers Watson Stock Comparison
How do Everest (EG) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Everest (EG) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) both belong to the Insurance industry, though EG is classified under Reinsurance while WTW falls under Insurance Brokers.
| Profile Item | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Everest Group, Ltd. | Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company |
| Country/Region | Bermuda | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Reinsurance | Insurance Brokers |
| Market Capitalization | 15.23 billion USD | 30.33 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | October 3, 1995 | June 12, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.99% | 2.59% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.67% | 12.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 10.80% | 8.63% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 21.71% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.42 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -23.84% | -30.39% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 382.05K | 537.05K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.14 | -0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.77 | -0.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Everest (EG) at 12.77% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.18% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EG
Insurance industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- EG
- 12.77%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
WTW
Insurance industry group
20.18%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- WTW
- 20.18%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Everest (EG) at 11.68% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 15.22% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EG
Insurance industry group
11.68%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- EG
- 11.68%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
WTW
Insurance industry group
15.22%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- WTW
- 15.22%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Everest (EG) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.77% | 20.18% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.43% | 5.35% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.68% | 15.22% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Everest (EG) at 0.83% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at -2.24% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Everest (EG) reports EPS growth of 18.94%, ranked against its industry; Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.83% | -2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.84% | 3.07% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 18.94% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 35.51% | 21.88% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Everest (EG) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Everest (EG) in Insurance and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Everest (EG) at 1.91% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 0.29% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EG
Insurance industry group
1.91%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- EG
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WTW
Insurance industry group
0.29%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- WTW
- 0.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Everest (EG) at 16.81% and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 23.34% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
EG
Insurance industry group
16.81%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- EG
- 16.81%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WTW
Insurance industry group
23.34%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- WTW
- 23.34%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.91% | 0.29% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.81% | 23.34% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 8.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 20.20 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
EG
Insurance industry group
8.64
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- EG
- 8.64
- Min
- 2.32
WTW
Insurance industry group
20.20
- Max
- 28.37
- WTW
- 20.20
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 0.94 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 2.95 sits in the pricier quartile — WTW costs more per dollar of sales.
EG
Insurance industry group
0.94
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- EG
- 0.94
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
WTW
Insurance industry group
2.95
- Max
- 4.03
- WTW
- 2.95
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Everest (EG) at 1.08 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Willis Towers Watson (WTW) at 3.91 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.
EG
Insurance industry group
1.08
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- EG
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.30
WTW
Insurance industry group
3.91
- Max
- 5.07
- WTW
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EG | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.64 | 20.20 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.94 | 2.95 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.08 | 3.91 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |