Seek Returns logo

EFX vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EFX and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEFXFLR
Company NameEquifax Inc.Fluor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization31.21 billion USD6.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 1, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EFX and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EFX vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEFXFLR
5-Day Price Return4.70%-3.35%
13-Week Price Return-8.35%13.64%
26-Week Price Return2.35%-12.60%
52-Week Price Return-10.68%-11.37%
Month-to-Date Return5.44%-24.87%
Year-to-Date Return-0.61%-13.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.19M7.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.06M3.93M
3-Month Volatility31.28%71.66%
Beta1.681.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EFX

12.93%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

EFX’s Return on Equity of 12.93% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EFX

10.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

EFX’s Net Profit Margin of 10.95% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EFX

18.52%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

EFX’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.52% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEFXFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)12.93%105.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.34%45.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.95%25.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.52%1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.80%3.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EFX

0.77

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EFX’s Current Ratio of 0.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EFX

0.96

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

EFX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EFX

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, EFX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEFXFLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.771.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.691.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.960.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.54--

Growth

Revenue Growth

EFX vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EFX vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EFX

0.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

EFX’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EFX

32.41%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

EFX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.41% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEFXFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.67%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.41%10.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EFX

48.21

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 48.21 places EFX in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLR

1.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EFX

5.28

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

EFX’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EFX

6.31

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

EFX’s P/B Ratio of 6.31 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EFX vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEFXFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)48.211.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.280.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.311.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.637.36