Seek Returns logo

ED vs. SMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ED and SMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEDSMR
Company NameConsolidated Edison, Inc.NuScale Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesIndustrials
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization36.05 billion USD4.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 1, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ED and SMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ED vs. SMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEDSMR
5-Day Price Return-1.14%9.95%
13-Week Price Return-3.36%41.79%
26-Week Price Return4.92%69.90%
52-Week Price Return-0.72%347.07%
Month-to-Date Return-3.43%-28.50%
Year-to-Date Return12.01%100.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.81M10.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.65M12.73M
3-Month Volatility15.29%108.43%
Beta0.322.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ED

8.48%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
19.69%
Q3
12.97%
Median
9.30%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.34%

ED’s Return on Equity of 8.48% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMR

-22.81%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

SMR has a negative Return on Equity of -22.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ED

11.99%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
25.37%
Q3
15.24%
Median
8.50%
Q1
4.09%
Min
-1.05%

ED’s Net Profit Margin of 11.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SMR

-221.07%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

SMR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -221.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ED

17.64%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
43.73%
Q3
25.91%
Median
19.49%
Q1
8.11%
Min
-0.18%

ED’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.64% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SMR

-233.90%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

SMR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -233.90%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEDSMR
Return on Equity (TTM)8.48%-22.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.72%-24.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.99%-221.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.64%-233.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.69%71.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.28

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.22
Median
0.94
Q1
0.86
Min
0.50

ED’s Current Ratio of 1.28 is in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SMR

4.22

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

SMR’s Current Ratio of 4.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.08

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.58
Q3
1.96
Median
1.56
Q1
1.20
Min
0.53

Falling into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, ED’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SMR

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, SMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ED

3.23

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
12.21
Q3
7.03
Median
3.61
Q1
2.92
Min
1.62

ED’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SMR

-58.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

SMR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.59. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEDSMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.284.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.984.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.080.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.23-58.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

ED vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ED vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ED

3.02%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
8.75%
Q3
5.46%
Median
4.09%
Q1
2.93%
Min
0.00%

ED’s Dividend Yield of 3.02% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ED

58.59%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
128.77%
Q3
97.17%
Median
66.46%
Q1
52.95%
Min
24.73%

ED’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.59% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEDSMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.02%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)58.59%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ED

19.38

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
28.21
Q3
21.40
Median
16.89
Q1
11.54
Min
5.08

ED’s P/E Ratio of 19.38 is within the middle range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SMR

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

P/E Ratio data for SMR is currently unavailable.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ED

2.32

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.52
Median
1.87
Q1
0.50
Min
0.27

ED’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SMR

171.50

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

With a P/S Ratio of 171.50, SMR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.67

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.97
Median
1.46
Q1
1.21
Min
0.86

ED’s P/B Ratio of 1.67 is within the conventional range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SMR

16.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 16.24, SMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ED vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEDSMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.38--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.32171.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.6716.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)145.39--