ED vs. NGG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ED and NGG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ED is a standard domestic listing, while NGG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	ED	NGG
Company Name	Consolidated Edison, Inc.	National Grid plc
Country	United States	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Utilities	Utilities
GICS Industry	Multi-Utilities	Multi-Utilities
Market Capitalization	36.97 billion USD	77.26 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	August 10, 2005
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ED and NGG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ED vs. NGG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ED	NGG
5-Day Price Return	3.48%	1.29%
13-Week Price Return	0.88%	13.27%
26-Week Price Return	1.07%	12.62%
52-Week Price Return	6.55%	20.75%
Month-to-Date Return	4.36%	3.33%
Year-to-Date Return	13.93%	24.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.13M	8.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.12M	7.23M
3-Month Volatility	16.24%	11.49%
Beta	0.38	0.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ED

8.69%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 20.00%
Q3: 13.72%
Median: 9.49%
Q1: 7.74%
Min: -0.57%

ED’s Return on Equity of 8.69% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NGG

7.66%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 20.00%
Q3: 13.72%
Median: 9.49%
Q1: 7.74%
Min: -0.57%

NGG’s Return on Equity of 7.66% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ED

12.27%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 22.58%
Q3: 14.93%
Median: 9.68%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -1.14%

ED’s Net Profit Margin of 12.27% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NGG

22.58%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 22.58%
Q3: 14.93%
Median: 9.68%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -1.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.58% places NGG in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ED

17.63%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 45.31%
Q3: 26.29%
Median: 19.25%
Q1: 7.66%
Min: -0.18%

ED’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.63% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NGG

40.12%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 45.31%
Q3: 26.29%
Median: 19.25%
Q1: 7.66%
Min: -0.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.12% places NGG in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ED	NGG
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.69%	7.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.86%	2.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.27%	22.58%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.63%	40.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	46.69%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.08

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 1.23
Q3: 1.11
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.51

ED’s Current Ratio of 1.08 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NGG

0.97

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 1.23
Q3: 1.11
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.51

NGG’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.08

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 3.16
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.56
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.58

Falling into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, ED’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NGG

1.23

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 3.16
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.56
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.58

NGG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.23 is typical for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ED

3.23

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 9.98
Q3: 5.96
Median: 3.48
Q1: 2.74
Min: 0.59

ED’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NGG

4.29

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 9.98
Q3: 5.96
Median: 3.48
Q1: 2.74
Min: 0.59

NGG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ED	NGG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	0.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.75	0.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	1.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.23	4.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

ED vs. NGG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ED vs. NGG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ED

3.05%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 6.29%
Q3: 4.88%
Median: 3.66%
Q1: 2.95%
Min: 1.67%

ED’s Dividend Yield of 3.05% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NGG

2.78%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 6.29%
Q3: 4.88%
Median: 3.66%
Q1: 2.95%
Min: 1.67%

NGG’s Dividend Yield of 2.78% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ED

55.43%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 110.63%
Q3: 96.69%
Median: 74.83%
Q1: 57.12%
Min: 31.93%

ED’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.43% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NGG

56.13%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 110.63%
Q3: 96.69%
Median: 74.83%
Q1: 57.12%
Min: 31.93%

NGG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.13% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ED	NGG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.05%	2.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	55.43%	56.13%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ED

18.15

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 29.37
Q3: 20.20
Median: 17.94
Q1: 10.63
Min: 5.90

ED’s P/E Ratio of 18.15 is within the middle range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NGG

20.20

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 29.37
Q3: 20.20
Median: 17.94
Q1: 10.63
Min: 5.90

NGG’s P/E Ratio of 20.20 is within the middle range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ED

2.23

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 3.47
Median: 2.06
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.28

ED’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NGG

4.56

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 3.47
Median: 2.06
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.28

NGG’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Multi-Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.50

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.71
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.53
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.88

ED’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is within the conventional range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NGG

1.42

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.71
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.53
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.88

NGG’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ED vs. NGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ED	NGG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	18.15	20.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.23	4.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.50	1.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	47.06	784.12