EC vs. FANG: Ecopetrol vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison
How do Ecopetrol (EC) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ecopetrol (EC) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though EC is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while FANG falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Diamondback Energy (FANG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Ecopetrol (EC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ecopetrol S.A. Sponsored ADR | Diamondback Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | Colombia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 31.97 billion USD | 49.96 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | September 18, 2008 | October 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 64.75% | 26.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 23.69% | 8.52% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.32% | 14.17% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 40.27% | 33.77% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.53 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.60% | -42.10% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.62M | 2.38M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.50 | 0.67 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.38 | 0.97 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Ecopetrol (EC) at 15.95% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EC
Energy industry group
15.95%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- EC
- 15.95%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Ecopetrol (EC) at 10.23% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EC
Energy industry group
10.23%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- EC
- 10.23%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Ecopetrol (EC) at 0.00% operates in the bottom quartile.
EC
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- EC
- 0.00%
- Min
- -24.52%
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.95% | 4.86% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.31% | 2.07% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.23% | 11.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 0.00% | 44.95% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.10% | 73.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ecopetrol (EC) at -10.23% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Ecopetrol (EC) at -39.54% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -10.23% | 35.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.15% | 15.99% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -39.54% | -63.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -35.34% | -38.48% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ecopetrol (EC) at 1.51 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
EC
Energy industry group
1.51
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- EC
- 1.51
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Ecopetrol (EC) at 0.96 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
EC
Energy industry group
0.96
- Max
- 1.75
- EC
- 0.96
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.51 | 0.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.96 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | 0.99 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Ecopetrol (EC) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports a yield of 2.47%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EC
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- EC
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ecopetrol (EC) at 36.09% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
EC
Energy industry group
36.09%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- EC
- 36.09%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.47% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 36.09% | 57.20% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ecopetrol (EC) at 8.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
EC
Energy industry group
8.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EC
- 8.45
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
A sales-based read is only available for Diamondback Energy (FANG), whose P/S ratio of 2.83 ranks against industry peers; Ecopetrol (EC) reports no figure this period.
EC
Energy industry group
--
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
- EC
- --
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ecopetrol (EC) at 0.01 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued near its industry’s middle — EC is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
EC
Energy industry group
0.01
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- EC
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.01
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EC | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.45 | 24.09 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | -- | 2.83 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 0.01 | 1.28 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 38,006.99% | 12.09% |