EBAY vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at EBAY and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | EBAY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | eBay Inc. | lululemon athletica inc. |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Broadline Retail | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
| Market Capitalization | 42.08 billion USD | 20.73 billion USD |
| Exchange | NasdaqGS | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | September 24, 1998 | July 27, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of EBAY and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | EBAY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 4.16% | -1.90% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 20.65% | -25.89% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 38.76% | -31.62% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 37.91% | -35.84% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 1.24% | -1.75% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 48.64% | -54.28% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 6.34M | 3.90M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 5.88M | 4.69M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 44.43% | 49.37% |
| Beta | 1.37 | 1.03 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
EBAY
43.08%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 47.53%
- Q3
- 31.20%
- Median
- 16.63%
- Q1
- 10.81%
- Min
- -7.57%
In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
LULU
42.05%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 42.05%
- Q3
- 24.41%
- Median
- 17.18%
- Q1
- 7.87%
- Min
- -8.23%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
EBAY
20.86%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 24.63%
- Q3
- 12.77%
- Median
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 4.50%
- Min
- -1.62%
A Net Profit Margin of 20.86% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
LULU
16.38%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 21.16%
- Q3
- 13.26%
- Median
- 6.06%
- Q1
- 3.93%
- Min
- -3.05%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
EBAY
21.38%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 27.48%
- Q3
- 17.60%
- Median
- 10.82%
- Q1
- 7.76%
- Min
- -6.73%
An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
LULU
22.88%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 11.68%
- Q1
- 6.26%
- Min
- -0.12%
An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | EBAY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 43.08% | 42.05% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 11.47% | 24.10% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 20.86% | 16.38% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 21.38% | 22.88% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 71.88% | 59.10% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
EBAY
1.00
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 3.54
- Q3
- 2.42
- Median
- 1.38
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.69
EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LULU
2.27
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.94
- Q3
- 2.22
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.48
- Min
- 0.74
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
EBAY
1.42
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 2.01
- Q3
- 1.31
- Median
- 0.72
- Q1
- 0.32
- Min
- 0.00
EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.79
- Q3
- 1.32
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
EBAY
57.95
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 37.34
- Q3
- 21.16
- Median
- 8.60
- Q1
- 3.22
- Min
- -19.29
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 32.83
- Median
- 7.87
- Q1
- 3.52
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | EBAY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.00 | 2.27 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.97 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 57.95 | -47.83 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
EBAY
1.24%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 4.06%
- Q3
- 2.07%
- Median
- 0.37%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.22%
- Q3
- 3.07%
- Median
- 2.34%
- Q1
- 1.11%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EBAY
24.13%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 114.82%
- Q3
- 62.39%
- Median
- 28.55%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 156.63%
- Q3
- 94.60%
- Median
- 52.65%
- Q1
- 35.04%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | EBAY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 24.13% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
EBAY
19.48
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 62.76
- Q3
- 32.50
- Median
- 17.65
- Q1
- 12.08
- Min
- 6.87
EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 19.48 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
LULU
12.01
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 48.15
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 20.70
- Q1
- 14.57
- Min
- 7.12
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
EBAY
4.06
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 5.19
- Q3
- 3.25
- Median
- 2.13
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.21
EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.06 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
LULU
1.97
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 3.06
- Median
- 1.66
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
EBAY
7.23
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 8.81
- Q3
- 5.19
- Median
- 3.42
- Q1
- 1.75
- Min
- 0.73
EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
LULU
5.37
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.74
- Q3
- 5.59
- Median
- 3.41
- Q1
- 2.01
- Min
- 0.56
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | EBAY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 19.48 | 12.01 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 4.06 | 1.97 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.23 | 5.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 20.00 | 14.90 |