Seek Returns logo

EBAY vs. LI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EBAY and LI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EBAY is a standard domestic listing, while LI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEBAYLI
Company NameeBay Inc.Li Auto Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailAutomobiles
Market Capitalization46.05 billion USD25.20 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 24, 1998July 30, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EBAY and LI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EBAY vs. LI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEBAYLI
5-Day Price Return8.33%0.73%
13-Week Price Return45.71%-13.87%
26-Week Price Return49.29%7.47%
52-Week Price Return80.56%142.14%
Month-to-Date Return9.83%-6.41%
Year-to-Date Return62.66%3.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.97M24.98M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.87M17.25M
3-Month Volatility40.74%49.59%
Beta1.331.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EBAY

43.08%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LI

11.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

LI’s Return on Equity of 11.89% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EBAY

20.86%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

EBAY’s Net Profit Margin of 20.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LI

5.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

LI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EBAY

21.38%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LI

5.44%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

LI’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.44% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEBAYLI
Return on Equity (TTM)43.08%11.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.47%5.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.86%5.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%5.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.88%20.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EBAY

1.00

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LI

1.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

LI’s Current Ratio of 1.87 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EBAY

1.42

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LI

0.13

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, LI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

57.95

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LI

-16.94

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

LI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.94. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEBAYLI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.001.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.971.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.420.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)57.95-16.94

Growth

Revenue Growth

EBAY vs. LI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EBAY vs. LI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EBAY

1.17%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.17% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

24.13%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LI

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

LI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEBAYLI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.17%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)24.13%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

20.64

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 20.64 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LI

21.30

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.30 places LI in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

4.31

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LI

1.19

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

LI’s P/S Ratio of 1.19 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EBAY

7.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LI

2.70

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

LI’s P/B Ratio of 2.70 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EBAY vs. LI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEBAYLI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.6421.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.311.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.232.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.188.74