Seek Returns logo

EBAY vs. IP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EBAY and IP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEBAYIP
Company NameeBay Inc.International Paper Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization42.08 billion USD24.64 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 24, 1998January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EBAY and IP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EBAY vs. IP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEBAYIP
5-Day Price Return4.16%0.02%
13-Week Price Return20.65%-9.15%
26-Week Price Return38.76%-5.12%
52-Week Price Return37.91%-2.16%
Month-to-Date Return1.24%0.56%
Year-to-Date Return48.64%-13.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.34M3.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.88M4.09M
3-Month Volatility44.43%34.35%
Beta1.371.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EBAY

43.08%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EBAY

20.86%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.86% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EBAY

21.38%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEBAYIP
Return on Equity (TTM)43.08%-0.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.47%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.86%-0.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%-0.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.88%28.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EBAY

1.00

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EBAY

1.42

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

57.95

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEBAYIP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.001.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.420.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)57.951.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

EBAY vs. IP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EBAY vs. IP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EBAY

1.24%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IP

3.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.30% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

24.13%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEBAYIP
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.24%3.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)24.13%180.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

19.48

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 19.48 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EBAY

4.06

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.06 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IP

1.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EBAY

7.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EBAY vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEBAYIP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.48--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.061.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.231.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.0048.94