EAT vs. YUM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at EAT and YUM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | EAT | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Brinker International, Inc. | Yum! Brands, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Market Capitalization | 5.42 billion USD | 40.53 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 6, 1984 | September 17, 1997 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of EAT and YUM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -4.59% | -3.52% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -27.96% | -3.20% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -12.13% | -9.55% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 47.82% | 7.47% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -3.79% | -3.93% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -7.87% | 8.85% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.39M | 1.56M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.35M | 1.93M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 34.98% | 21.49% |
| Beta | 1.43 | 0.70 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
EAT
197.96%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
EAT’s Return on Equity of 197.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
YUM
117.64%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
YUM’s Return on Equity of 117.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
7.12%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
YUM
18.11%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
9.51%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.51% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
YUM
30.93%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
An Operating Profit Margin of 30.93% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 197.96% | 117.64% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 14.81% | 21.40% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 7.12% | 18.11% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 9.51% | 30.93% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 18.25% | 46.48% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
0.31
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.31 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
YUM
0.82
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
YUM’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
1.20
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
YUM
30.97
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 30.97, YUM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
EAT
9.66
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
YUM
4.68
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
YUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.31 | 0.82 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.22 | 0.64 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 30.97 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 9.66 | 4.68 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
EAT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
YUM
1.86%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EAT
0.39%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
YUM
53.77%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.77% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.39% | 53.77% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
EAT
14.53
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/E Ratio of 14.53 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
YUM
28.84
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
YUM’s P/E Ratio of 28.84 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
EAT
1.03
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.03 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
YUM
5.22
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
YUM’s P/S Ratio of 5.22 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
21.17
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
EAT’s P/B Ratio of 21.17 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
YUM
208.10
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
At 208.10, YUM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 14.53 | 28.84 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.03 | 5.22 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 21.17 | 208.10 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 13.46 | 26.90 |