Seek Returns logo

EAT vs. ULTA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EAT and ULTA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEATULTA
Company NameBrinker International, Inc.Ulta Beauty, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization5.63 billion USD24.95 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 6, 1984October 25, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EAT and ULTA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EAT vs. ULTA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEATULTA
5-Day Price Return-4.80%0.49%
13-Week Price Return-30.74%16.46%
26-Week Price Return-15.07%51.81%
52-Week Price Return58.67%48.83%
Month-to-Date Return-0.07%1.77%
Year-to-Date Return-4.31%27.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.41M0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.36M0.76M
3-Month Volatility35.46%29.57%
Beta1.430.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EAT

197.96%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

EAT’s Return on Equity of 197.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ULTA

48.78%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Return on Equity of 48.78% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

7.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ULTA

10.51%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

ULTA’s Net Profit Margin of 10.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

9.51%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.51% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ULTA

13.84%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

ULTA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.84% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEATULTA
Return on Equity (TTM)197.96%48.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.81%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.12%10.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.51%13.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.25%38.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

0.31

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.31 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ULTA

1.39

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

ULTA’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

1.20

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULTA

0.11

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EAT

9.66

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULTA

649.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 649.00, ULTA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEATULTA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.311.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.220.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.200.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.66649.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

EAT vs. ULTA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EAT vs. ULTA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EAT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ULTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EAT

0.39%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ULTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEATULTA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.39%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EAT

14.74

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/E Ratio of 14.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ULTA

20.84

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

ULTA’s P/E Ratio of 20.84 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EAT

1.05

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.05 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ULTA

2.74

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

ULTA’s P/S Ratio of 2.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

21.17

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

EAT’s P/B Ratio of 21.17 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ULTA

8.89

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

ULTA’s P/B Ratio of 8.89 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EAT vs. ULTA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEATULTA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.7420.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.052.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)21.178.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.6522.29