Seek Returns logo

EAT vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EAT and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EAT is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEATSE
Company NameBrinker International, Inc.Sea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureEntertainment
Market Capitalization5.40 billion USD87.20 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 6, 1984October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EAT and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EAT vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEATSE
5-Day Price Return6.17%-9.16%
13-Week Price Return-28.43%-20.55%
26-Week Price Return-25.44%-8.62%
52-Week Price Return-4.60%34.19%
Month-to-Date Return4.17%-9.86%
Year-to-Date Return-14.44%32.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.85M6.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.46M4.44M
3-Month Volatility41.68%39.27%
Beta1.391.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EAT

132.28%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
85.86%
Q3
39.97%
Median
16.82%
Q1
6.71%
Min
-33.94%

EAT’s Return on Equity of 132.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SE

15.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.86%
Q3
22.17%
Median
13.67%
Q1
4.55%
Min
-17.95%

SE’s Return on Equity of 15.25% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

7.66%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.51%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.65%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-9.83%

EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SE

6.74%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
29.05%
Median
15.14%
Q1
4.44%
Min
-21.70%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

9.82%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
41.93%
Q3
22.25%
Median
15.03%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-15.28%

EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.82% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SE

8.32%

Entertainment Industry

Max
43.42%
Q3
28.90%
Median
18.77%
Q1
9.11%
Min
-4.88%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.32% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEATSE
Return on Equity (TTM)132.28%15.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.30%5.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.66%6.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.82%8.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.44%44.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

0.35

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.72
Min
0.16

EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.35 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SE

1.44

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.06
Median
1.58
Q1
0.87
Min
0.38

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

1.60

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
5.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.60 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SE

0.62

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.80
Median
0.15
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.62 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EAT

9.66

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
4.07
Q1
1.21
Min
-11.84

EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEATSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.351.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.241.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.600.62
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.66-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

EAT vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EAT vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EAT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.26%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.71%
Q3
1.23%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EAT

0.38%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
149.29%
Q3
62.26%
Median
24.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.38% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
37.50%
Median
24.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEATSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.38%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EAT

15.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
52.15
Q3
31.98
Median
20.63
Q1
14.77
Min
3.30

EAT’s P/E Ratio of 15.46 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SE

58.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
80.06
Q3
53.00
Median
28.44
Q1
18.00
Min
2.61

A P/E Ratio of 58.79 places SE in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EAT

1.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.94
Q3
3.96
Median
2.01
Q1
1.22
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.18 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SE

3.96

Entertainment Industry

Max
10.86
Q3
6.98
Median
4.25
Q1
2.56
Min
0.51

SE’s P/S Ratio of 3.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

17.70

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
29.33
Q3
13.12
Median
4.61
Q1
2.02
Min
0.37

EAT’s P/B Ratio of 17.70 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SE

10.38

Entertainment Industry

Max
19.63
Q3
10.35
Median
5.18
Q1
2.07
Min
0.59

SE’s P/B Ratio of 10.38 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EAT vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEATSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.4658.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.183.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.7010.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.4218.25