EAT vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at EAT and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
EAT is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
| Symbol | EAT | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Brinker International, Inc. | Sea Limited |
| Country | United States | Singapore |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Communication Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Entertainment |
| Market Capitalization | 7.00 billion USD | 103.40 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 6, 1984 | October 20, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of EAT and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | SE |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -1.32% | 17.33% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 8.09% | 22.61% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -13.66% | 42.39% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 129.95% | 161.00% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -0.14% | 11.50% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 18.97% | 64.62% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.50M | 6.13M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.55M | 4.77M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 39.65% | 54.07% |
| Beta | 1.45 | 1.56 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
EAT
301.31%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 83.01%
- Q3
- 39.51%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 5.32%
- Min
- -45.92%
EAT’s Return on Equity of 301.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
SE
10.85%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 42.50%
- Q3
- 22.75%
- Median
- 12.88%
- Q1
- 7.15%
- Min
- -6.84%
SE’s Return on Equity of 10.85% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
6.49%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.45%
- Q3
- 14.67%
- Median
- 8.69%
- Q1
- 3.34%
- Min
- -11.30%
EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
SE
4.86%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 45.25%
- Q3
- 23.93%
- Median
- 14.60%
- Q1
- 4.89%
- Min
- -22.94%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, SE’s Net Profit Margin of 4.86% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
8.62%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 38.76%
- Q3
- 21.15%
- Median
- 14.20%
- Q1
- 6.43%
- Min
- -14.56%
EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
SE
5.99%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 46.83%
- Q3
- 28.87%
- Median
- 15.26%
- Q1
- 8.95%
- Min
- -5.53%
SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.99% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 301.31% | 10.85% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 12.99% | 3.97% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 6.49% | 4.86% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 8.62% | 5.99% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 17.64% | 44.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
0.28
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.68
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.19
EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
SE
1.51
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 6.80
- Q3
- 3.77
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.39
SE’s Current Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
2.09
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 9.88
- Q3
- 4.54
- Median
- 1.52
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.09 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
SE
0.68
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 1.65
- Q3
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.14
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.00
SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
EAT
3.54
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.88
- Q3
- 11.95
- Median
- 3.87
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
SE
-6.05
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 62.11
- Q3
- 31.19
- Median
- 7.50
- Q1
- 2.02
- Min
- -6.33
SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.28 | 1.51 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.20 | 1.33 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 2.09 | 0.68 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.54 | -6.05 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
EAT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 5.88%
- Q3
- 2.37%
- Median
- 0.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
SE
0.00%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 2.54%
- Q3
- 1.29%
- Median
- 0.61%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EAT
0.39%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 127.31%
- Q3
- 56.79%
- Median
- 19.58%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
SE
0.00%
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 82.30%
- Q3
- 45.76%
- Median
- 29.16%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
EAT
21.53
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 59.44
- Q3
- 33.98
- Median
- 22.25
- Q1
- 15.53
- Min
- 7.61
EAT’s P/E Ratio of 21.53 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
SE
118.35
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 53.51
- Q3
- 45.31
- Median
- 33.16
- Q1
- 18.21
- Min
- 3.89
At 118.35, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
EAT
1.40
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.74
- Q3
- 3.88
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- 0.17
EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
SE
5.75
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 12.81
- Q3
- 7.20
- Median
- 4.68
- Q1
- 3.32
- Min
- 0.79
SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
26.43
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 20.90
- Q3
- 9.78
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 2.22
- Min
- 0.47
At 26.43, EAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
SE
8.33
Entertainment Industry
- Max
- 17.11
- Q3
- 8.38
- Median
- 5.24
- Q1
- 2.18
- Min
- 0.67
SE’s P/B Ratio of 8.33 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 21.53 | 118.35 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.40 | 5.75 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 26.43 | 8.33 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 18.32 | 31.45 |