EAT vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at EAT and LVS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | EAT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Brinker International, Inc. | Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| Market Capitalization | 6.79 billion USD | 36.81 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 6, 1984 | December 15, 2004 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of EAT and LVS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -3.47% | -0.92% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 2.38% | 26.73% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -4.75% | 27.03% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 124.05% | 31.26% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -3.17% | 2.33% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 15.35% | 4.40% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.71M | 3.87M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.51M | 5.37M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 36.76% | 33.08% |
| Beta | 1.46 | 1.02 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
EAT
301.31%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 83.01%
- Q3
- 39.51%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 5.32%
- Min
- -45.92%
EAT’s Return on Equity of 301.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
LVS
51.35%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 83.01%
- Q3
- 39.51%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 5.32%
- Min
- -45.92%
In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, LVS’s Return on Equity of 51.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
6.49%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.45%
- Q3
- 14.67%
- Median
- 8.69%
- Q1
- 3.34%
- Min
- -11.30%
EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LVS
12.16%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.45%
- Q3
- 14.67%
- Median
- 8.69%
- Q1
- 3.34%
- Min
- -11.30%
LVS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
8.62%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 38.76%
- Q3
- 21.15%
- Median
- 14.20%
- Q1
- 6.43%
- Min
- -14.56%
EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LVS
21.36%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 38.76%
- Q3
- 21.15%
- Median
- 14.20%
- Q1
- 6.43%
- Min
- -14.56%
An Operating Profit Margin of 21.36% places LVS in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 301.31% | 51.35% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 12.99% | 6.64% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 6.49% | 12.16% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 8.62% | 21.36% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 17.64% | 46.98% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
0.28
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.68
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.19
EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LVS
1.22
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.68
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.19
LVS’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
2.09
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 9.88
- Q3
- 4.54
- Median
- 1.52
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.09 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LVS
7.95
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 9.88
- Q3
- 4.54
- Median
- 1.52
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
LVS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
EAT
3.54
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.88
- Q3
- 11.95
- Median
- 3.87
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LVS
5.34
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.88
- Q3
- 11.95
- Median
- 3.87
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
LVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.28 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.20 | 1.14 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 2.09 | 7.95 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.54 | 5.34 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
EAT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 5.88%
- Q3
- 2.37%
- Median
- 0.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
LVS
1.93%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 5.88%
- Q3
- 2.37%
- Median
- 0.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LVS’s Dividend Yield of 1.93% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EAT
0.39%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 127.31%
- Q3
- 56.79%
- Median
- 19.58%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
LVS
50.71%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 127.31%
- Q3
- 56.79%
- Median
- 19.58%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.71% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.93% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.39% | 50.71% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
EAT
20.32
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 59.44
- Q3
- 33.98
- Median
- 22.25
- Q1
- 15.53
- Min
- 7.61
EAT’s P/E Ratio of 20.32 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
LVS
26.23
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 59.44
- Q3
- 33.98
- Median
- 22.25
- Q1
- 15.53
- Min
- 7.61
LVS’s P/E Ratio of 26.23 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
EAT
1.32
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.74
- Q3
- 3.88
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- 0.17
EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
LVS
3.19
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.74
- Q3
- 3.88
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- 0.17
LVS’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
26.43
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 20.90
- Q3
- 9.78
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 2.22
- Min
- 0.47
At 26.43, EAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
LVS
15.44
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 20.90
- Q3
- 9.78
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 2.22
- Min
- 0.47
LVS’s P/B Ratio of 15.44 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 20.32 | 26.23 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.32 | 3.19 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 26.43 | 15.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 17.29 | 31.33 |