EAT vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at EAT and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Brinker International, Inc. | lululemon athletica inc. |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
| Market Capitalization | 6.79 billion USD | 23.74 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | January 6, 1984 | July 27, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of EAT and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -3.47% | 1.50% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 2.38% | -38.80% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -4.75% | -49.31% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 124.05% | -23.54% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -3.17% | -1.20% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 15.35% | -48.19% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.71M | 3.75M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.51M | 2.99M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 36.76% | 50.78% |
| Beta | 1.46 | 1.10 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
EAT
301.31%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 83.01%
- Q3
- 39.51%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 5.32%
- Min
- -45.92%
EAT’s Return on Equity of 301.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
LULU
43.48%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 53.33%
- Q3
- 26.13%
- Median
- 18.47%
- Q1
- 7.99%
- Min
- -10.49%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
6.49%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.45%
- Q3
- 14.67%
- Median
- 8.69%
- Q1
- 3.34%
- Min
- -11.30%
EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LULU
16.82%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 23.35%
- Q3
- 13.49%
- Median
- 8.45%
- Q1
- 4.18%
- Min
- -3.90%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
8.62%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 38.76%
- Q3
- 21.15%
- Median
- 14.20%
- Q1
- 6.43%
- Min
- -14.56%
EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LULU
23.36%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 13.00%
- Q1
- 7.02%
- Min
- -3.59%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 301.31% | 43.48% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 12.99% | 25.05% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 6.49% | 16.82% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 8.62% | 23.36% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 17.64% | 59.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
0.28
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.68
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.19
EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LULU
2.28
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.49
- Median
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.80
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
2.09
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 9.88
- Q3
- 4.54
- Median
- 1.52
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.09 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.67
- Q3
- 1.29
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
EAT
3.54
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 26.88
- Q3
- 11.95
- Median
- 3.87
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 35.85
- Median
- 9.20
- Q1
- 4.29
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.28 | 2.28 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.20 | 0.98 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 2.09 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.54 | -47.83 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
EAT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 5.88%
- Q3
- 2.37%
- Median
- 0.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 6.59%
- Q3
- 3.60%
- Median
- 2.59%
- Q1
- 0.95%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EAT
0.39%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 127.31%
- Q3
- 56.79%
- Median
- 19.58%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 195.44%
- Q3
- 106.47%
- Median
- 58.77%
- Q1
- 36.52%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
EAT
20.32
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 59.44
- Q3
- 33.98
- Median
- 22.25
- Q1
- 15.53
- Min
- 7.61
EAT’s P/E Ratio of 20.32 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
LULU
13.67
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 63.29
- Q3
- 34.64
- Median
- 18.01
- Q1
- 13.88
- Min
- 6.04
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
EAT
1.32
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.74
- Q3
- 3.88
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- 0.17
EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
LULU
2.30
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.46
- Q3
- 3.13
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
26.43
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 20.90
- Q3
- 9.78
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 2.22
- Min
- 0.47
At 26.43, EAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
LULU
7.80
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.76
- Q3
- 6.00
- Median
- 3.26
- Q1
- 1.97
- Min
- 0.69
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 20.32 | 13.67 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.32 | 2.30 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 26.43 | 7.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 17.29 | 15.57 |