EAT vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at EAT and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Brinker International, Inc. | lululemon athletica inc. |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
| Market Capitalization | 5.62 billion USD | 20.65 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | January 6, 1984 | July 27, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of EAT and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -0.13% | -2.14% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -27.04% | -26.71% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -16.16% | -37.73% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 58.53% | -33.68% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -0.13% | -2.14% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -4.36% | -54.47% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.37M | 4.24M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.36M | 4.67M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 35.41% | 49.84% |
| Beta | 1.43 | 1.03 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
EAT
197.96%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
EAT’s Return on Equity of 197.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
LULU
42.05%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 42.05%
- Q3
- 24.41%
- Median
- 17.18%
- Q1
- 7.87%
- Min
- -8.23%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
7.12%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LULU
16.38%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 21.16%
- Q3
- 13.26%
- Median
- 6.06%
- Q1
- 3.93%
- Min
- -3.05%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
EAT
9.51%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.51% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LULU
22.88%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 11.68%
- Q1
- 6.26%
- Min
- -0.12%
An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 197.96% | 42.05% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 14.81% | 24.10% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 7.12% | 16.38% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 9.51% | 22.88% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 18.25% | 59.10% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
0.31
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.31 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LULU
2.27
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.94
- Q3
- 2.22
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.48
- Min
- 0.74
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
1.20
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.79
- Q3
- 1.32
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
EAT
9.66
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 32.83
- Median
- 7.87
- Q1
- 3.52
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.31 | 2.27 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.22 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 9.66 | -47.83 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
EAT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.22%
- Q3
- 3.07%
- Median
- 2.34%
- Q1
- 1.11%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EAT
0.39%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 156.63%
- Q3
- 94.60%
- Median
- 52.65%
- Q1
- 35.04%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
EAT
14.84
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/E Ratio of 14.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
LULU
12.16
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 48.15
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 20.70
- Q1
- 14.57
- Min
- 7.12
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 12.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
EAT
1.06
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.06 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
LULU
1.99
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 3.06
- Median
- 1.66
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
EAT
21.17
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
EAT’s P/B Ratio of 21.17 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
LULU
5.37
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.74
- Q3
- 5.59
- Median
- 3.41
- Q1
- 2.01
- Min
- 0.56
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | EAT | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 14.84 | 12.16 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 1.06 | 1.99 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 21.17 | 5.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 13.74 | 15.09 |