Seek Returns logo

EAT vs. HLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EAT and HLT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEATHLT
Company NameBrinker International, Inc.Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization5.40 billion USD62.78 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 6, 1984December 12, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EAT and HLT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EAT vs. HLT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEATHLT
5-Day Price Return6.17%-1.77%
13-Week Price Return-28.43%0.72%
26-Week Price Return-25.44%5.34%
52-Week Price Return-4.60%6.74%
Month-to-Date Return4.17%4.95%
Year-to-Date Return-14.44%9.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.85M1.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.46M1.74M
3-Month Volatility41.68%20.98%
Beta1.391.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EAT

132.28%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
85.86%
Q3
39.97%
Median
16.82%
Q1
6.71%
Min
-33.94%

EAT’s Return on Equity of 132.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HLT

171.01%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
85.86%
Q3
39.97%
Median
16.82%
Q1
6.71%
Min
-33.94%

HLT’s Return on Equity of 171.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

7.66%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.51%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.65%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-9.83%

EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HLT

14.19%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.51%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.65%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-9.83%

HLT’s Net Profit Margin of 14.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

9.82%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
41.93%
Q3
22.25%
Median
15.03%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-15.28%

EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.82% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLT

21.99%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
41.93%
Q3
22.25%
Median
15.03%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-15.28%

HLT’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.99% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEATHLT
Return on Equity (TTM)132.28%171.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.30%10.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.66%14.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.82%21.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.44%37.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

0.35

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.72
Min
0.16

EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.35 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HLT

0.66

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.72
Min
0.16

HLT’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

1.60

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
5.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.60 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HLT

73.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
5.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 73.65, HLT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EAT

9.66

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
4.07
Q1
1.21
Min
-11.84

EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HLT

4.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
4.07
Q1
1.21
Min
-11.84

HLT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEATHLT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.350.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.240.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.6073.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.664.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

EAT vs. HLT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EAT vs. HLT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EAT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.26%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HLT

0.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.26%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Yield of 0.23% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EAT

0.38%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
149.29%
Q3
62.26%
Median
24.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.38% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HLT

8.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
149.29%
Q3
62.26%
Median
24.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HLT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.71% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEATHLT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.38%8.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EAT

15.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
52.15
Q3
31.98
Median
20.63
Q1
14.77
Min
3.30

EAT’s P/E Ratio of 15.46 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HLT

37.59

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
52.15
Q3
31.98
Median
20.63
Q1
14.77
Min
3.30

A P/E Ratio of 37.59 places HLT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EAT

1.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.94
Q3
3.96
Median
2.01
Q1
1.22
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.18 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HLT

5.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.94
Q3
3.96
Median
2.01
Q1
1.22
Min
0.16

HLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.33 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

17.70

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
29.33
Q3
13.12
Median
4.61
Q1
2.02
Min
0.37

EAT’s P/B Ratio of 17.70 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HLT

245.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
29.33
Q3
13.12
Median
4.61
Q1
2.02
Min
0.37

At 245.97, HLT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EAT vs. HLT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEATHLT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.4637.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.185.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.70245.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.4227.26