Seek Returns logo

EAT vs. F: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EAT and F, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEATF
Company NameBrinker International, Inc.Ford Motor Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobiles
Market Capitalization6.79 billion USD45.73 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 6, 1984June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EAT and F by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EAT vs. F: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEATF
5-Day Price Return-3.47%0.44%
13-Week Price Return2.38%6.88%
26-Week Price Return-4.75%22.89%
52-Week Price Return124.05%7.18%
Month-to-Date Return-3.17%3.79%
Year-to-Date Return15.35%16.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.71M57.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.51M90.59M
3-Month Volatility36.76%25.52%
Beta1.461.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EAT

301.31%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

EAT’s Return on Equity of 301.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

F

7.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

F’s Return on Equity of 7.05% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

6.49%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

F

1.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 1.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

8.62%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

F

1.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.59% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEATF
Return on Equity (TTM)301.31%7.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.99%1.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.49%1.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.62%1.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.64%7.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

0.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

F

1.10

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

F’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

2.09

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.09 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

F

3.50

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.50, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EAT

3.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEATF
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.281.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.200.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.093.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.540.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

EAT vs. F: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EAT vs. F: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EAT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

F

6.48%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.48%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EAT

0.39%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

F

59.55%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.55% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEATF
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.39%59.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EAT

20.32

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

EAT’s P/E Ratio of 20.32 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

F

14.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

F’s P/E Ratio of 14.61 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EAT

1.32

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

F

0.25

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

26.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 26.43, EAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

F

0.96

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

F’s P/B Ratio of 0.96 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EAT vs. F: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEATF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.3214.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.320.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)26.430.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.294.55